DAILY POST ARTICLE 7TH NOVEMBER 2011
Last week, the UK government announced that it would be looking to award £950 million to boost the economy through the second round of its Regional Growth Fund.
This is a £1.4 billion fund that aims to stimulate private sector investment by providing support for projects that offer significant potential for long-term economic growth and the creation of additional sustainable private sector jobs.
Sounds fantastic for the economy but the bad news for Wales is that the Regional Growth Fund is based in England only and, as a result of devolution, the Welsh Government will need to find its own funding for such economic development levers What is more worrying though is that increased spending across the border on economic development may well have a knock on effect on North Wales.
Certainly, the neighbouring area of the North West of England is one of those regions that has benefited with funding of £227m awarded to 39 projects, some of which are going directly to private businesses and others that are supporting key new infrastructure projects.
For example, Burnley Council's bid for £8.8m will reinstate 500 metres of rail track that, in turn, will halve the train travel time between Burnley and Manchester. It will also help to regenerate a collection of former mill buildings along the Leeds-Liverpool canal.That will certainly help the area become more attractive to potential investors.
In addition, Energy Coast West Cumbria has been awarded £5.5m to help firms maximise opportunities in nuclear and renewable-energy supply chains, a move that could have serious implications for Anglesey’s bid to become one of the key centres for the energy sector in the UK.
In the private sector, one of the companies that has individually benefited from the fund is Cheshire-based Bentley, which received a £3m grant to support the development of a new engine plant, safeguarding more than 200 jobs.
So, whilst the North West of England has access to funding for projects that will create over 47,000 jobs, what is happening here in Wales?As many businesses are no doubt aware, the last Welsh Assembly Government decided to abolish grants to businesses, replacing it with the Economic Renewal Programme (ERP).
Yet, according to data released last month, only 16 firms have been helped by the ERP in the first six months of 2011.But what about the billions of European funding available to the poorest parts of Wales, including Anglesey, Conwy, Gwynedd and Denbighshire?
Despite the Welsh Government having already committed over £1.5 billion to 236 projects since 2007, only 256 jobs have been created in Anglesey, only 46 new businesses created in Conwy and only 254 participants have gone on to further learning through European funded training schemes in Gwynedd.
That is a woeful performance and there are real worries that the effect of the Regional Growth Fund along with those enterprise zones already established in the North West of England, will place North Wales at a serious disadvantage at a time when support for private firms is critical.
But this should not be surprising, as the private sector has been largely excluded from direct participation in European funding schemes in Wales, with the vast majority of projects going to Welsh Government or local authorities.In contrast, there is now an emphasis on greater partnership between the public and private sectors in England, with council and business groups coming together to bid for projects, as they did for enterprise zones.
That is something that has been sadly missing in Wales over the last decade and I fear that the billions of European funding that could, and should have made a real difference, as the Regional Growth Fund will do in the North West of England, will have little effect on the transformation of the North Wales economy.
Nov 082011
Nov 082011
DAILY POST ARTICLE 7TH NOVEMBER 2011
Last week, the UK government announced that it would be looking to award £950 million to boost the economy through the second round of its Regional Growth Fund.
This is a £1.4 billion fund that aims to stimulate private sector investment by providing support for projects that offer significant potential for long-term economic growth and the creation of additional sustainable private sector jobs.
Sounds fantastic for the economy but the bad news for Wales is that the Regional Growth Fund is based in England only and, as a result of devolution, the Welsh Government will need to find its own funding for such economic development levers What is more worrying though is that increased spending across the border on economic development may well have a knock on effect on North Wales.
Certainly, the neighbouring area of the North West of England is one of those regions that has benefited with funding of £227m awarded to 39 projects, some of which are going directly to private businesses and others that are supporting key new infrastructure projects.
For example, Burnley Council's bid for £8.8m will reinstate 500 metres of rail track that, in turn, will halve the train travel time between Burnley and Manchester. It will also help to regenerate a collection of former mill buildings along the Leeds-Liverpool canal.That will certainly help the area become more attractive to potential investors.
In addition, Energy Coast West Cumbria has been awarded £5.5m to help firms maximise opportunities in nuclear and renewable-energy supply chains, a move that could have serious implications for Anglesey’s bid to become one of the key centres for the energy sector in the UK.
In the private sector, one of the companies that has individually benefited from the fund is Cheshire-based Bentley, which received a £3m grant to support the development of a new engine plant, safeguarding more than 200 jobs.
So, whilst the North West of England has access to funding for projects that will create over 47,000 jobs, what is happening here in Wales?As many businesses are no doubt aware, the last Welsh Assembly Government decided to abolish grants to businesses, replacing it with the Economic Renewal Programme (ERP).
Yet, according to data released last month, only 16 firms have been helped by the ERP in the first six months of 2011.But what about the billions of European funding available to the poorest parts of Wales, including Anglesey, Conwy, Gwynedd and Denbighshire?
Despite the Welsh Government having already committed over £1.5 billion to 236 projects since 2007, only 256 jobs have been created in Anglesey, only 46 new businesses created in Conwy and only 254 participants have gone on to further learning through European funded training schemes in Gwynedd.
That is a woeful performance and there are real worries that the effect of the Regional Growth Fund along with those enterprise zones already established in the North West of England, will place North Wales at a serious disadvantage at a time when support for private firms is critical.
But this should not be surprising, as the private sector has been largely excluded from direct participation in European funding schemes in Wales, with the vast majority of projects going to Welsh Government or local authorities.In contrast, there is now an emphasis on greater partnership between the public and private sectors in England, with council and business groups coming together to bid for projects, as they did for enterprise zones.
That is something that has been sadly missing in Wales over the last decade and I fear that the billions of European funding that could, and should have made a real difference, as the Regional Growth Fund will do in the North West of England, will have little effect on the transformation of the North Wales economy.
Last week, the UK government announced that it would be looking to award £950 million to boost the economy through the second round of its Regional Growth Fund.
This is a £1.4 billion fund that aims to stimulate private sector investment by providing support for projects that offer significant potential for long-term economic growth and the creation of additional sustainable private sector jobs.
Sounds fantastic for the economy but the bad news for Wales is that the Regional Growth Fund is based in England only and, as a result of devolution, the Welsh Government will need to find its own funding for such economic development levers What is more worrying though is that increased spending across the border on economic development may well have a knock on effect on North Wales.
Certainly, the neighbouring area of the North West of England is one of those regions that has benefited with funding of £227m awarded to 39 projects, some of which are going directly to private businesses and others that are supporting key new infrastructure projects.
For example, Burnley Council's bid for £8.8m will reinstate 500 metres of rail track that, in turn, will halve the train travel time between Burnley and Manchester. It will also help to regenerate a collection of former mill buildings along the Leeds-Liverpool canal.That will certainly help the area become more attractive to potential investors.
In addition, Energy Coast West Cumbria has been awarded £5.5m to help firms maximise opportunities in nuclear and renewable-energy supply chains, a move that could have serious implications for Anglesey’s bid to become one of the key centres for the energy sector in the UK.
In the private sector, one of the companies that has individually benefited from the fund is Cheshire-based Bentley, which received a £3m grant to support the development of a new engine plant, safeguarding more than 200 jobs.
So, whilst the North West of England has access to funding for projects that will create over 47,000 jobs, what is happening here in Wales?As many businesses are no doubt aware, the last Welsh Assembly Government decided to abolish grants to businesses, replacing it with the Economic Renewal Programme (ERP).
Yet, according to data released last month, only 16 firms have been helped by the ERP in the first six months of 2011.But what about the billions of European funding available to the poorest parts of Wales, including Anglesey, Conwy, Gwynedd and Denbighshire?
Despite the Welsh Government having already committed over £1.5 billion to 236 projects since 2007, only 256 jobs have been created in Anglesey, only 46 new businesses created in Conwy and only 254 participants have gone on to further learning through European funded training schemes in Gwynedd.
That is a woeful performance and there are real worries that the effect of the Regional Growth Fund along with those enterprise zones already established in the North West of England, will place North Wales at a serious disadvantage at a time when support for private firms is critical.
But this should not be surprising, as the private sector has been largely excluded from direct participation in European funding schemes in Wales, with the vast majority of projects going to Welsh Government or local authorities.In contrast, there is now an emphasis on greater partnership between the public and private sectors in England, with council and business groups coming together to bid for projects, as they did for enterprise zones.
That is something that has been sadly missing in Wales over the last decade and I fear that the billions of European funding that could, and should have made a real difference, as the Regional Growth Fund will do in the North West of England, will have little effect on the transformation of the North Wales economy.
THE REGIONAL GROWTH FUND
Regional Growth Fund
Comments Off
Nov 032011
This week, the government announced that it would be lookingto give out £950 million to boost the economy further through the second round of its Regional Growth Fund.
Based in England only, this is a £1.4 billion fund that operatesover three years (2011 to 2014) with the aim of stimulating private sectorinvestment by providing support for projects that offer significant potentialfor long term economic growth and the creation of additional sustainableprivate sector jobs.
In particular, the fund aims particularly to help supportthose areas and communities that are currently dependent on the public sectorto make the transition to private sector led growth and prosperity.
To qualify for support from the Regional Growth Fund,projects should demonstrate that they:
- create additional sustainable private sector growth;
- rebalance the economy in those areas currently dependent onthe public sector;
- would not otherwise go ahead without support from theRegional Growth Fund;
- offer value for money
- be state aid compliant.
Similar to the Enterprise Zones in England, the Regional GrowthFund is competitive and only those bids that best lever private sectorinvestment, meet the fund objectives and criteria and offer the best value formoney will be supported.
On Monday, the UK Government announced the 119 successfulbids in the second round of the Regional Growth Fund. But it is also worthnoting the expected impact of the first round of funding, as shown in the diagram below.
According to the UK Government,
- there were 464 bids for a total of £2.78 billion of funding with two thirds of the funding requests was for finance of between £1m and £5m.
- Half of the bids came from three regions, namely the West Midlands, the North West and the North East and only 4 per cent from London
- There were 50 successful projects in Round 1 for £450m which were expected to create 27,549 direct jobs and a further 96,654 indirect jobs in the English economy.
According to Regeneris Consulting, the real winners were the West Midlands - capturing 25 per cent of R1 funding including a £70m grant to Jaguar Land Rover and the North East of England, which had 14 successful bids across the region, capturing around 13 per cent of the funding.
In contrast, the perceived losers were London and South East England – which submitted 52 applications and got 1 approved. The North West of England also lost out, only capturing around 6 per cent of round 1 funding with no projects in either Cumbria or Lancashire.
The jobs to be created are merely projections by the companies, as we used to have with the old Regional Selective Assistance grants in Wales. The cost per direct job is slightly higher for Round 1 (at £16,334 per job) but this would be expected given that a significant number of the projects are supporting R&D and innovation. However, it is far lower than the estimated cost per job for the European Convergence Programme for West Wales and the Valleys of around £44,000 per job.
The UK Government also seems to be focusing on using large companies to leverage further investment into these regional economies. Indeed, as Regeneris Consulting point out, SMEs did poorly out of the first round of funding, with the majority going to investments in larger firms to expand facilities, increase R&D and increase employment. Only time will tell whether this will work, given that studies have consistently shown that SMEs are more effective at using such grants.
One final issue, which is more to do with the transparency of policymaking. In Wales, the Economic Renewal Programme is the closest equivalent of the Regional Growth Fund and yet it would seem that it is not performing as well, with the Welsh Conservatives claiming that only 16 firms have been helped in the first six months of 2011. In contrast to the detailed data presented by the UK Government, the biggest problem in assessing the effectiveness of Welsh Government policy is the reluctance to publish regular data on its economic programmes, something it used to do regularly to the old Economic Development Committee in the first and second Assemblies.
Perhaps this is something that Nick Ramsay, the new chair of the Enterprise and Business Committee within the National Assembly for Wales, should restore so that at least the Welsh Government is held accountable for its policies in business and economic development.
THE REGIONAL GROWTH FUND
Regional Growth Fund
Comments Off
Nov 032011
This week, the government announced that it would be lookingto give out £950 million to boost the economy further through the second round of its Regional Growth Fund.
Based in England only, this is a £1.4 billion fund that operatesover three years (2011 to 2014) with the aim of stimulating private sectorinvestment by providing support for projects that offer significant potentialfor long term economic growth and the creation of additional sustainableprivate sector jobs.
In particular, the fund aims particularly to help supportthose areas and communities that are currently dependent on the public sectorto make the transition to private sector led growth and prosperity.
To qualify for support from the Regional Growth Fund,projects should demonstrate that they:
- create additional sustainable private sector growth;
- rebalance the economy in those areas currently dependent onthe public sector;
- would not otherwise go ahead without support from theRegional Growth Fund;
- offer value for money
- be state aid compliant.
Similar to the Enterprise Zones in England, the Regional GrowthFund is competitive and only those bids that best lever private sectorinvestment, meet the fund objectives and criteria and offer the best value formoney will be supported.
On Monday, the UK Government announced the 119 successfulbids in the second round of the Regional Growth Fund. But it is also worthnoting the expected impact of the first round of funding, as shown in the diagram below.
According to the UK Government,
- there were 464 bids for a total of £2.78 billion of funding with two thirds of the funding requests was for finance of between £1m and £5m.
- Half of the bids came from three regions, namely the West Midlands, the North West and the North East and only 4 per cent from London
- There were 50 successful projects in Round 1 for £450m which were expected to create 27,549 direct jobs and a further 96,654 indirect jobs in the English economy.
According to Regeneris Consulting, the real winners were the West Midlands - capturing 25 per cent of R1 funding including a £70m grant to Jaguar Land Rover and the North East of England, which had 14 successful bids across the region, capturing around 13 per cent of the funding.
In contrast, the perceived losers were London and South East England – which submitted 52 applications and got 1 approved. The North West of England also lost out, only capturing around 6 per cent of round 1 funding with no projects in either Cumbria or Lancashire.
The jobs to be created are merely projections by the companies, as we used to have with the old Regional Selective Assistance grants in Wales. The cost per direct job is slightly higher for Round 1 (at £16,334 per job) but this would be expected given that a significant number of the projects are supporting R&D and innovation. However, it is far lower than the estimated cost per job for the European Convergence Programme for West Wales and the Valleys of around £44,000 per job.
The UK Government also seems to be focusing on using large companies to leverage further investment into these regional economies. Indeed, as Regeneris Consulting point out, SMEs did poorly out of the first round of funding, with the majority going to investments in larger firms to expand facilities, increase R&D and increase employment. Only time will tell whether this will work, given that studies have consistently shown that SMEs are more effective at using such grants.
One final issue, which is more to do with the transparency of policymaking. In Wales, the Economic Renewal Programme is the closest equivalent of the Regional Growth Fund and yet it would seem that it is not performing as well, with the Welsh Conservatives claiming that only 16 firms have been helped in the first six months of 2011. In contrast to the detailed data presented by the UK Government, the biggest problem in assessing the effectiveness of Welsh Government policy is the reluctance to publish regular data on its economic programmes, something it used to do regularly to the old Economic Development Committee in the first and second Assemblies.
Perhaps this is something that Nick Ramsay, the new chair of the Enterprise and Business Committee within the National Assembly for Wales, should restore so that at least the Welsh Government is held accountable for its policies in business and economic development.













